Loading...
Loading...
Positioning & Messaging
Surveys ask what people think. Voice captures what they actually feel: the sadness that means "I don't get it," the enthusiasm that means "shut up and take my money," and the anger that means you've already lost them.
ReadingMinds AI voice interviews detect these signals in real time, tie every finding to cited evidence, and tell you exactly which message wins and why.
Customers decide how they feel about your positioning in seconds. That decision lives in their voice, not in a text box.
Flat tone, short answers, polite agreement. They've already decided your message isn't for them.
Sharp frustration or pushback about your positioning. Your messaging hit a nerve, and not in a good way.
Measured, unemotional delivery. Your messaging didn't land. It didn't offend; it just didn't matter.
Warm, positive reaction with genuine warmth. Your message resonated and left them feeling good about the brand.
Energy spikes, faster speech, forward-leaning language. The signals that predict sharing, not just nodding.
These are real signals ReadingMinds surfaces during positioning studies. Every finding links to cited evidence your team can verify.
Participants showed elevated energy and forward-leaning language when speed was emphasized. Accuracy messaging received polite but emotionally flat responses: classic sadness signals.
Emotional resonance was 2x higher when the customer's own framing was mirrored back. Internal positioning language triggered confusion and avoidance in 4 out of 5 interviews.
'Know before you build' produced enthusiasm and excitement. 'AI-powered analysis' produced sadness and clarifying questions. Every finding is traceable to the exact quote and timestamp.
Upload taglines, positioning statements, landing page copy, or pitch decks. Tell Emma what to explore: which words resonate, what confuses, what gets ignored.
Short voice conversations with your actual audience. Emma classifies six emotions with intensity scoring in real time. No scripts, no leading questions.
Every finding links to the exact quote, timestamp, and emotional signal that produced it. You know which message won, why it won, and have the evidence to defend the decision.
Bad positioning doesn't just underperform. It compounds. Every campaign, every sales deck, every landing page built on the wrong message wastes budget and erodes trust.
60%
of B2B buyers say vendor messaging doesn't address their actual pain points
$846K
at-risk revenue found in one 48-hour ReadingMinds study
8 weeks
typical agency timeline for messaging research ReadingMinds delivers in 48 hours or less
Validate positioning before committing budget. Know which message triggers genuine excitement and which triggers polite nodding. Ship campaigns backed by emotional evidence, not internal consensus.
Test launch messaging with real prospects before go-live. Identify which words or phrases your audience actually uses to describe the problem you solve, then mirror that language across every touchpoint.
Align brand voice with how customers think and talk. Stop guessing which narrative framework resonates. Hear the conviction, confusion, and enthusiasm in real time, with cited evidence for every recommendation.
Talk to Emma. She'll detect the emotions and intensity beneath your words, then deliver a cited report to your inbox. See the mechanism that makes voice-based messaging testing work.
No permanent recordings stored. Transcripts and emotion tags only.